Stuff Journalists Like – #42 Corporations

Conglomerates

There was a time your local newspaper was
owned by someone you had the chance of running into at the bank or grocery
store. When the people making the decision about coverage and what you were
going to be looking at when you ate your Cheerios lived in the same zip code. Journalists
then knew who they worked for and who signed their checks. Those were simpler
times.

Nowadays, newspapers are owned by large, multinational
conglomerates that run local newspapers from high-rise offices in a one of
those “media capitals.” Now instead of having an ear on the ground floor of a
newsroom, today’s owners have their ears on the bottom line.

And this change has only been good news for journalists. Because
if there is one thing journalists clamor to it’s synergy. Getting news
assignments from an editor they’ve never met makes the job so much easier for
journalists.

With corporate owners, journalists get perks like getting
free AOL accounts, stock options and feeling the guilt over selling their soul
after making promises in college they wouldn’t. And with working for a publicly traded company, journalists’ jobs are not only affected by their own
performance but also the performance of Wall Street. Also, working under the
helm of corporate giants relieves journalists of having to aspire to win journalism
awards. That Pulitzer prize money isn’t going to pay the rent or for pay for
the cost of the bright idea of trying to win back readers by charging them to
let them print out their own newspaper.  

But for journalists, the best part of working for a large,
faceless corporation is having to “report” on their employer. When the company
decides to layoff of 21 percent of its staff or require unpaid furloughs or
outsource its reporters, journalists’ work is nearly done for them with a
prepared statement. Oh, and don’t forget being blacklisted from dozens of newspapers when being fired from a corporate-owned newspaper. 

With owners overlords like Gannett and Knight Ridder McClatchy, News Corp.
and MediaNews, instead of serving readers, journalists get the honor of serving
shareholders and board of directors instead.

And unlike local newspaper owners, big bother
corporations like to keep an eye on their little reporters after hours,
tracking their Facebook, Twitter accounts, and make them sign to make sure they
don’t say/do/write anything to harm the company name. Journalists have been so busy trying to bring down the man, they didn’t notice that they ended up working for the man.

Corporations also require their minions employees to sign legal documents forbidding them from writing/saying/thinking anything negative about the company? On that note . . .

The content of this post was solely written by a former Gannett (twice) and MediaNews employee.

Comments

  1. Pat Morris says:

    My favorite part is letting the “customer” determine the news content. So if someone calls the publisher and says they want a story about their dog or a favorable push for their business, we “please the customer” and run it. that way we don’t have to make those pesky news decisions.

  2. Corey says:

    Great post! Explains exactly why I’m having so much trouble finding a job in journalism…. Yay corporations!
    Keep up the good work.

  3. Ricky says:

    Watching a round of layoffs at a McClatchy newspaper was the worst work-related experience of my short professional life. Though I wasn’t laid off, it was part of my decision to leave quickly thereafter.

Speak Your Mind

*